Sponsored By

Judge overrules attempts to dismiss Los Angeles antitrust case

A recent lawsuit charged restaurants with price fixing for discussing a healthcare surcharge.

Lisa Jennings, Executive Editor

August 13, 2016

2 Min Read
RestaurantHospitality logo in a gray background | RestaurantHospitality

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge on Thursday cleared the way for a price-fixing lawsuit to proceed in a case involving a group of restaurants that instituted a 3-percent surcharge to cover employee healthcare costs.

Judge Lisa Hart Cole overruled arguments on behalf of the restaurants to have the charges dismissed, and she agreed that the conduct at issue amounted to a per se violation of California antitrust law, according to attorney Daniel Sterrett, who represents plaintiff Margaret Imhoff in the potential class action.

The ruling allows the case to proceed to trial, unless there is a settlement sooner. The court is expected to rule on the lawsuit’s proposed class-action status in March.

The antitrust case began in September after a group of restaurateurs, including some of the city’s most popular restaurants, were charged with colluding on price in establishing a 3-percent surcharge to address the costs of providing healthcare.

The restaurants cited in the case include Animal, AOC, The Hungry Cat, Lucques, Melisse, Rustic Canyon, Son of a Gun and Trois Mec, though Sterrett said other restaurants may be included.

According to the complaint, the restaurants violated state antitrust laws in 2014 after the owners of Rustic Canyon emailed a group of “like-minded” restaurant operators to plan a course of action for implementing the surcharge.

Josh Loeb, co-owner of the Rustic Canyon Family of Restaurants, said in a statement that motions to dismiss are often difficult to win in such cases and the judge decided to let the lawsuit proceed for now. 

"However, we continue to believe the claims here have no merit whatsoever," Loeb said. "We're very proud of the fact that we have been able to help our staff get great, fully covered healthcare, and we have all always been very transparent with our customers about the nature of the surcharge.

"We will continue to fight what we believe is a groundless case and are confident we will prevail when all is said and done," he added.

Contact Lisa Jennings: [email protected]

Follow her on Twitter: @livetodineout

About the Author

Lisa Jennings

Executive Editor, Nation's Restaurant News and Restaurant Hospitality

Lisa Jennings is executive editor of Nation’s Restaurant News and Restaurant Hospitality. She joined the NRN staff as West Coast editor in 2004 as a veteran journalist. Before joining NRN, she spent 11 years at The Commercial Appeal, the daily newspaper in Memphis, Tenn., most recently as editor of the Food and Health & Wellness sections. Prior experience includes staff reporting for the Washington Business Journal and United Press International.

Lisa’s areas of expertise include coverage of both large public restaurant chains and small independents, the regulatory and legal landscapes impacting the industry overall, as well as helping operators find solutions to run their business better.

Lisa Jennings’ experience:

Executive editor, NRN (March 2020 to present)

Executive editor, Restaurant Hospitality (January 2018 to present)

Senior editor, NRN (September 2004 to March 2020)

Reporter/editor, The Commercial Appeal (1990-2001)

Reporter, Washington Business Journal (1985-1987)

Contact Lisa Jennings at:

[email protected]

@livetodineout

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisa-jennings-83202510/

 

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Get the latest breaking news in the industry, analysis, research, recipes, consumer trends, the latest products and more.

You May Also Like